![]() The Missing Conversation: Why Communications Advocacy Should Remain #1 on Your To Do List – Report from Finding Philanthropy's Sweet Spot Forum, May 16, 2006 I was confronted (yet again) last week with a pointed reminder of one of philanthropy's biggest Achilles' heels – the often overlooked or misunderstood importance of integrating innovative communications strategies into every program. It happened during a very interesting presentation at the Philanthropy's Sweet Spot Forum, co-sponsored by Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors and the Stanford Social Innovation review. The speaker was Peter Goldmark, now Director of the Climate and Air program at Environmental Defense(ED) (one of the best organizational communicators I know), formerly presiding over the International Herald Tribune and the Rockefeller Foundation. Obviously, Goldmark is one smart guy who knows how to engage his audience. He told the story of his program's proposal to FedEx to help transition their fleet to hybrid trucks. ED's condition? That every FedEx employee receive the opportunity to learn about this change, and its benefits for the climate. The partnership took off and the transition is in progress. The new hybrid trucks will signal this change in their blue and green color scheme, and for the ubiquitous FedEx truck, that color change is a high-impact communications signal. This is a win-win partnership. ED's Climate and Air program derives these benefits:
To hear this optimistic and visionary leader, and excellent communicator, express a defeatist view of the role of communications caused me no small amount of agita. During his excellent presentation, Goldmark repeatedly encouraged the audience to challenge the points he made. So I took him up on his invitation to challenge, making these points:
EVENT POST SCRIPT On further reflection, I emailed Goldmark with these communications recommendations for the ED/FedEx program:
If communications is missing from Peter Goldmark's perspective, then I'm certain that it's missing from the lens and conversation of most nonprofit and foundation staff members. That means nothing is more important for those of you charged with communications than to become persistent advocates for communications as the strategy necessary for maximizing program impact. Make, and keep, that #1 on your To Do list. I'm interested in your thoughts. Do your colleagues get it? Or do they view communications as a support mechanism, much like the accounting and HR departments? Any suggestions on how to effect change here? Let me know via email. For more articles and case studies, subscribe now to the Getting Attention e-update. © 2002 - Nancy E. Schwartz. All rights reserved. About the Author Nancy E. Schwartz helps nonprofits succeed through effective marketing and communications. As President of Nancy Schwartz & Company (www.nancyschwartz.com), Nancy and her team provide marketing planning and implementation services to organizations as varied as the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Center for Asian American Media, and Wake County (NC) Health Services. Subscribe to her free Getting Attention e-update (http://www.nancyschwartz.com/getting_attention.html) and read her blog at http://www.gettingattention.org for more insights, ideas and great tips on attracting the attention your organization deserves. NOTE: You're welcome to "reprint" this article online as long as it remains complete and unaltered (including the copyright and "about the author" info at the end), and you send a copy of your reprint. Print this article Back to article archive Contact us today. © 2002-, Nancy Schwartz & Company Revised |
Don't Forget to Read the Getting Attention Blog Timely ideas, tactics, and tips for nonprofit communicators |